Andrew Foley
Abstract
Alan
Paton’s short fiction remains a neglected area in South African
literary studies. Apart from ephemeral reviews, only a handful of
critical works have paid any attention to Paton’s stories, and most of
these have tended to regard the stories as slight and fragmentary. It
is my contention, however, that there is much of interest and value in
Paton’s stories, not only as literary works, but for what they reveal
about Paton’s response to the historical era in which they were
produced. This article focusses on the “Diepkloof stories”, which
explore his experiences as Principal of Diepkloof Reformatory. Though
set at the time of his principalship in the 1930s and 1940s, they were
written in the 1950s – after the publication of Cry, the Beloved Country,
and, importantly, during the first decade of the National Party’s
implementation of apartheid. Viewed as a contemporaneous reaction to the
unfolding events of the time, they represent a perspective different
from that of Cry, the Beloved Country and of his non-fictional
writing, one that is bleaker, more sombre, even pessimistic. The stories
hover between the genres of autobiography and fiction, participating in
the conventions of both but never fully committing themselves to either
category. The tension between Paton’s public identity as writer and
social activist and his multivalent role in the stories as author,
narrator, main character and source material, marks the stories as
unique in South African literature, and raises intriguing narratological
questions about the status of the texts.
Go to AJOL for full-text access.